New: Rookie Stats
See how this season’s rookie class is performing with our new Rookie Stats page.
View Rookie Stats
October 20, 2026 at 4:30 AM UTC
NewsNBA Expansion Picture Shifts: Las Vegas Reportedly Nears Ownership Decision as League Is Unhappy With Seattle Bids
The NBA is reportedly nearing a decision on its preferred Las Vegas ownership group while remaining dissatisfied with Seattle bids. Commissioner Adam Silver has also reintroduced Mexico City, and the split could reshape the expansion timeline.
The NBA's expansion plans have moved into a new phase as the 2026-27 season approaches. Reports published Friday, Oct. 16, say the league is nearing a decision on its preferred ownership group in Las Vegas. The same reports say the league remains dissatisfied with the bids from prospective Seattle ownership groups. That gap could force the NBA to reconsider its expansion timeline, according to Yahoo Sports. ESPN's Brian Windhorst separately reported that Seattle's place in the process is less secure than it once appeared.
Las Vegas pulls ahead
The league has said publicly that it is focused on expanding in Las Vegas and Seattle. Both are markets with deep basketball histories and significant revenue potential. The latest reporting suggests they are no longer moving in lockstep.
Las Vegas appears to be the clear favorite to land a team. The NBA is reportedly close to settling on the ownership group it prefers there. Seattle's path looks more complicated because the league is reportedly unhappy with what prospective groups have offered. The reports do not detail the bids or say what the league wants changed, so the specific shortfall is not public.
The practical implication is that the two cities could move on different schedules. The league may be ready to act in one market while the other is unresolved.
Silver and the leverage game
Windhorst reported, citing multiple ownership sources, that Commissioner Adam Silver appears to be raising the stakes in a leverage game over the possible future of the Seattle SuperSonics. According to the report, Silver left owners at last month's Board of Governors meeting with the impression that a Seattle expansion team was no longer a lock.
He also reintroduced Mexico City as a possible destination. Owners were told that at least one Mexico City-based group has approached PJT Partners, the league's expansion partner. The group reportedly has a plan to launch a team and develop a new arena district, and the proposal apparently caught the league's attention, according to several sources.
Silver has not guaranteed anything over the past year, the report notes. He has also made clear there is no assurance the league will add two teams at the same time. The NBA has done that before, adding the Charlotte Hornets and Miami Heat in 1988. The reporting suggests a simultaneous two-team class is not a given this time.
Whether Mexico City is a genuine alternative or a negotiating tool is not established. Windhorst's framing, a leverage game, points to the second reading. That is analysis of the reporting, not a confirmed league position.
Why the timeline matters
A decision in Las Vegas alone would be a different outcome from the paired expansion many had assumed. A single new franchise would change the league's footprint and its competitive and financial landscape, but less than two would. If the NBA waits on Seattle, it has to decide whether to hold the Las Vegas process or proceed. The reports do not say which way it is leaning.
The prospect of a delayed or reshaped Seattle process also affects the bidders. If the league is unhappy with current offers, those groups face pressure to improve them. A credible Mexico City option, if it is one, would add to that pressure. What the league ultimately requires from Seattle ownership is not yet public.
The Portland connection
The uncertainty extends beyond the expansion markets. Yahoo Sports noted that it matters to the Portland Trail Blazers, whose arena situation has become a major storyline under new owner Tom Dundon. The franchise and local officials have been negotiating the future of the Moda Center, with renovations and public funding playing significant roles.
Windhorst addressed whether an unresolved Seattle could influence how the league approaches Portland. He cautioned against going too far: "Let's stop short of the concept that the league could leave Seattle open as a leverage point for other teams trying to get arena deals -- the Portland Trail Blazers being at the top of that list -- because Silver is on the record saying relocation is currently not on the table." He acknowledged, however, that the situation could give the league an incentive to hold off on expansion in Seattle.
Silver's on-the-record position is that relocation is not on the table. Nothing in the reporting says Portland is moving or that the league is using Seattle against it. The connection is that an open Seattle market sits in the background of arena talks in a neighboring city.
What to watch
The first marker is whether the NBA formally names its preferred Las Vegas group. That would be the clearest sign that the reported decision is imminent. The second is whether Seattle groups return with revised bids, or whether the league offers any public signal about its timeline. The third is whether the Mexico City proposal develops into a formal part of the process or stays a talking point among owners.
The league has not announced changes to its stated focus on Las Vegas and Seattle. Until it does, the reporting describes a process in flux: Las Vegas appears closer to a resolution, Seattle's position is less certain, and the commissioner is keeping his options open.